Platform review · November 2026

Triple Dragon
Funding review

A closer look at the loans behind games and apps — and the contracts behind your investment.

Game-development desk with a graphics display, drawing tablet and controller
External ratings available

Triple Dragon Funding · Checked 9 November 2026

Minimum investment€1,000
Typical loan term6–24 months
Investor returnPer offer
Early exitDiscretionary

The 60-second version

Triple Dragon Funding gives investors exposure to loans financing video-game and mobile-app businesses. You acquire a claim through the platform, rather than shares in a studio. The published minimum is €1,000 per loan, with typical terms of six to 24 months.

This is a specialist credit exposure: developer revenue, contractual rights and the collection structure matter more than the popularity of a game. A large publisher appearing in the collateral description does not make that publisher your guarantor. Keep the borrower, lender, originator and platform distinct when assessing a deal.

Capital at risk

Capital is at risk. Repayment and returns are not guaranteed.

How independent reviewers rate it

Independent reviewers use different methods and dates. We show their published scores in their original scales, without averaging them.

P2P Empire

8.1/10

Moderate platform risk

Platform Risk Score. Source date: .

Read the assessment ↗
P2P-Game

29/100

Risk category

Platform rating. Source date: .

Read the assessment ↗

External opinions, checked 9 November 2026. These are not our five-factor score, a consensus rating or a guarantee of safety.

How the investment works

The published structure uses an SPV to lend to a developer. Claim rights move through Triple Dragon Funding to investors; borrower receipts pass through a co-controlled collection account. Security can include receivables and contractual rights.

Before committing, trace who owes you money at every step. Read the assignment agreement alongside the individual offer: the headline description of the platform cannot establish the enforceability, priority or recovery value of security on your particular loan.

Advertised returns and actual cash flow

The current investor page says returns vary by opportunity and risk profile. We therefore do not present the 13.5% figure in older reviews as a universal current rate. Daily payment and compounding options are described publicly, but the offer governs the applicable return.

Separate the interest charged to a developer from the interest paid to an investor. For your own comparison, count invested and idle cash, payment delays, any recovery deductions and tax. Compounding changes the timing and exposure of cash flows; it does not remove credit risk.

Assessment against our five checks

Our framework separates protection, performance, structure and access to money. These percentages are methodology weights, not scores assigned to the platform.

Investor protection30% weight

Identify the secured party and your contractual rights. Company registration alone does not establish an investment-services licence or deposit protection.

Delivery track record20% weight

Distinguish the wider group’s lending history from the performance of claims acquired through this platform. The two datasets are not interchangeable.

Yield reality20% weight

Use the rate in the actual offer and compare it with money received, rather than treating an advertised or compounded figure as a realised return.

Ownership & structure15% weight

The originator and platform perform different roles. Assess the ability of each contractual counterparty to fulfil its obligations.

Exit options15% weight

Treat the scheduled repayment date as the planning horizon. An optional repurchase request is not dependable liquidity.

Read our grading methodology →

What works

  • A clearly defined games-and-apps lending specialism.
  • A published explanation of the claim and collection structure.
  • Individual offers allow contractual terms to be assessed before investment.

What to consider

  • Receivables depend on commercial performance and the ability to collect them.
  • Several connected counterparties sit between the borrower and investor.
  • A €1,000 ticket makes small-portfolio diversification harder.
  • Repayment and recovery can take longer than the original loan term.

How to get started

Create and verify your account

Complete registration and verification on the official website.

Review the funding route

Read the offer, assignment agreement, parties and security documents.

Choose your investment

Choose an amount while allowing for the €1,000 minimum and concentration.

Monitor your portfolio

Monitor actual payments and outstanding exposure until repayment.

May suit you if

  • Investors able to evaluate specialist business-credit contracts.
  • A portfolio with room to diversify across borrowers and counterparties.

Less suitable if

  • Money needed on a fixed near-term date.
  • Anyone expecting an insured account or guaranteed redemption.

How the lending models differ

Different credit exposures, not interchangeable products. Check the terms and sources in each review before comparing headline returns.

PlatformExposureMinimumReturn on offerAccess to money
Triple Dragon FundingGame-studio credit€1,000Per offerOriginator discretion; no resale market
VIAINVESTConsumer-loan securities€50Up to 13%Hold to maturity; no assured early sale
LANDEAgricultural loans€5011.2% advertisedEligible loans only; buyer required

Frequently asked questions

A platform offering claims connected with financing for video-game and app businesses. The operating company identifies itself as Triple Dragon Funding S.à r.l., Luxembourg, B301533.

The investor page states €1,000 for each loan offer. Budget for diversification rather than assuming one minimum-sized investment creates a diversified portfolio.

The current terms explicitly distinguish Early Exit from investor matching. Do not assume a transferable marketplace exists.

No universal current rate is stated on the investor page we checked. Verify the rate, payment option and maturity in your offer.

No. A contractual repurchase obligation still depends on the obligated counterparty being able to pay. It should be assessed as additional counterparty exposure.

Our assessment

The contract matters more than the headline yield.

The useful question is whether you understand the specific claim and can hold it through delays. Triple Dragon Funding offers a distinct lending specialism, but contracts and counterparty quality must carry the investment case.

Use external ratings as starting points for research. Read the current offer and contractual documents before making your own decision.

Explore the official platform ↗

Fees and access to your money

ItemCurrent terms
Early ExitDiscretionary originator repurchase; not a secondary market.
BuybackAn obligation of the originator under the assignment agreement, not a promise by the platform.
Recovery costsReasonable external enforcement costs may be recovered from repayments, within the contractual limits.